Font Size: A A A

Home > News > Interviews > Exporting corruption report

Interviews

Exporting corruption report

Governments can do more to fight corruption, says an international pressure group.

Governments of major exporting nations must do more to stop their multi-national companies from bribing their way into international markets, the anti-corruption group Transparency International (TI) said in a report on enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention.

The Convention is an agreement among 40 major exporting countries to stop the practice of bribing foreign governments – to win contracts and licences or dodge taxes and local laws, for example.

According to the report, EXPORTING CORRUPTION – OECD PROGRESS REPORT 2013, 30 of those 40 countries signed up to the convention are barely investigating and prosecuting foreign bribery, considering the large value of their exports.

Transparency International Chair Huguette Labelle said: “The 40 countries, which represent more than two thirds of global exports, would make it very hard to get away with bribery if they lived up to the requirements of the OECD anti-bribery convention.”

According to TI, countries fail to enforce foreign bribery rules for several reasons, including: budget cuts in enforcement agencies, a lack of specialised bodies to investigate foreign bribery and a failure to take advantage of existing deterrents.

Only eight countries have met their commitments under the Convention. The failure of so many countries to crack down on companies that bribe foreign governments imperils the 1997 agreement, Transparency International warned.

The countries actively enforcing the Convention only account for 26 per cent of global exports. If countries that accounted for half of global exports were actively enforcing the OECD Convention, then it could be considered a success, TI suggests.

Twenty countries, including G20 members Brazil, Japan, South Korea and The Netherlands have done little or nothing to hold companies and business people to account for bribing foreign governments. Twenty-three countries have not brought any criminal charges for major cross-border corruption by companies in the last four years.

However, the campaign group adds, there are promising developments in legislative reforms and restructuring of anti-corruption agencies in Australia, Brazil and Canada that may bear fruit in the coming years. Transparency International also called on major exporters China, India, Indonesia and Saudi Arabia to sign the OECD convention.

“It is especially important these economies meet their G20 commitments and ensure that their companies, which have increasing influence overseas, operate cleanly,” said Labelle.


Tags

Related News