Interviews

Tracking tech trust

by Mark Rowe

A GDPR-style opt-out for location tracking would increase trust in tech, writes Ed Parkes, of Emerging Field.

While a new generation of tools have made it easier to understand how we are tracked online, and GDPR has made us more aware of how to opt-out of data collection, our movements are tracked offline as well using the Wi-Fi and GPS in our smartphones. While transparency around online tracking is improving – Apple, for example, has recently incorporated a privacy report feature in its update of Safari in iOS 14 – users are not being given clear and concise prompts that explain when location data is being collected and by who as we move through the physical world.

A collaboration between data ethics projects Emerging Field and Twigged has resulted in a new public facing resource, called Clear Your Tracks to help people understand how location data is collected by their devices and what they can do to reduce data collection.

When the method and purpose of location tracking are obscured, users are denied the proper informed consent and transparency that we have come to expect thanks to the GDPR regulations. When it comes to mobile software and location tracking, a study has shown that up to 90 percent of smartphone apps collect information, including location data, that is sold on to advertisers using a mechanism known as third party trackers. Unlike location data collection in order for the software to work, for instance in mapping, route planning and ride hailing apps, third party trackers collect data specifically for the purpose of selling it on. This means that advertisers can effectively link online and offline behaviour information to build more detailed customer profiles for individual users.

A New York Times investigation found that there is a market worth $21 billion per year in the US alone in collecting and trading location data about smartphone users, often without their knowledge. Research by the Royal Society also suggests it takes just four points in time and space to identify 95 percent of individuals.

Location data is also collected in a number of different ways, not only via GPS. For instance, if you leave your Wi-Fi on when you’re on the London Underground, even if you’re not connected to the Wi-Fi hotspots provided by TfL, they can track you based on which hotspots you move through. This information is used to analyse how people are using the city’s transport network and at an aggregate level to determine advertising. TfL’s tracking of our movement is relatively benign – they are open about collecting the data and how they are using it and they have privacy protections in place.

However, there is no clear opt-out for this kind of tracking, and almost no awareness that the data is being collected in the first place. The only way to opt-out is to turn your Wi-Fi off.

Clear Your Tracks is an online tool designed to tell the story of how and why location information is collected about users. It shows in an approachable way how data is collected and provides users with clear instructions on how to opt-out. But even when this information is clearly provided, there seems to be a disproportionate burden on the user for finding the controls, which vary depending on the make and model of the device. And there is little incentive for the makers of mobile hardware and software to make this journey easier.

As many nations look to digital solutions for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic through contact tracing apps, winning the public’s trust when it comes to data collection is more important than ever. The Benchmark Initiative, which funded the development of Clear Your Tracks, aims to raise awareness about and start a conversation around the ethics of the collection and use of location data. But with the future of digital regulation in the UK unclear as it begins to move away from the EU regulatory environment that created GDPR, it may fall on individual users and companies to spread awareness about data collection. In the absence of regulatory incentives for tech companies to provide informed consent around the collection and use of location data, companies that use location data can win the trust of their users if they are transparent about how user data is being collected, including providing options to opt-out.

Related News

  • Interviews

    Griffin passes 100

    by Mark Rowe

    Graham Bassett has become chairman of the London Project Griffin Board. He takes over from Mark Szczesnowicz. The City of London Police…

  • Interviews

    Entrepreneur professionals

    by Mark Rowe

    Organisational structures and behaviours within the modern global business economy are undergoing a period change, largely influenced by the increased interaction between…

Newsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter to stay on top of security news and events.

© 2024 Professional Security Magazine. All rights reserved.

Website by MSEC Marketing