Recently large scale DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) cyberattacks disrupted the availability of popular websites like Twitter, Netflix and Paypal, among others, across North America and Europe, writes Ajay Vij, pictured, Senior Vice President and Head of Financial Services in Europe, at Infosys.
A distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) is when the attack is launched by many unique IP addresses—or, as in this case, devices—all aiming traffic at one or multiple targets. The target simply crumbles under the pressure of so much traffic. And that is what happened in this case. In the last year, hackers have upped the DDoS stakes in a big way. The hacker group claiming responsibility for these attacks said that the day’s antics were just a dry run and that it has its sights set on a much bigger target.
This is a good example to explain why organisations across the world, and more specifically in the financial services domain, are getting increasingly paranoid about security. After all, when was the last time you heard of an “unlimited” budget? But that’s just how the CEO of one of the largest banks in the world, had described their cybersecurity spending agenda for 2015. Financial services institutions face about four times the number of attacks compared to other companies on average, and thus they are among the biggest spenders on cybersecurity. That trend will only intensify as banks embrace digitisation and the higher cyber security risk that comes with it. For confirmation of the latter, one doesn’t need to look further than the audacious attacks on Banco del Austro in Ecuador, Tien Phong Bank in Vietnam and Bangladesh’s Central Bank, no less, in the past 18 months.
Clearly, banks need to put together a comprehensive yet practical strategy for safeguarding their organisations and their customers from attack. These are some of the things they should consider:
Balance detection and prevention:
Since it will not always be possible to predict and prevent fraud, banks need to continue to invest in fraud detection as a parallel line of defense. They should therefore allocate IT spending between a variety of solutions, such as those, which prevent data loss or improve data monitoring and others, which employ behavior analytics, machine learning or data matching with the goal of preventing attack. There is also growing acknowledgement that biometrics and tokenisation, in addition to validating identity and securing payments, could be used to protect data.
Become stronger on the inside:
A survey by the Association of Corporate Counsel reported that one in three data breaches may be attributed to employee behavior. This is a grim reminder of the need to strengthen internal controls by not only tightening security systems but also making sure employees can distinguish between safe and unsafe actions. Some restrictions – such as prohibiting the use of official email for personal activities – may also be necessary. There is a strong use case for Artificial Intelligence based system for preventing internal fraud.
Put knowledge to use:
Reportedly, banks use less than 5 percent of the data available for making decisions related to fraud prevention. There is an urgent need to reclaim this lost opportunity. As the volume and variety of data continues to increase, technology has tried to keep pace with advancements such as data visualisation that allow organisations to grasp complex information through visual patterns. By leveraging such technologies, banks would be able to spot telltale deviant patterns that are often associated with fraud and take timely action.
Partner up:
Digitisation is on the agenda of most countries, which see it as a way to social and economic progress. Consequently, many governments are taking an active role in improving cyber security. Where possible, banks should work alongside governments – and also with the industry, academia, fintech startups and others – sharing their knowledge and experience to tackle current and emerging problems across the security ecosystem.
