Interviews

Grenfell report welcome

by Mark Rowe

The Guild of Architectural Ironmongers (GAI) has welcomed the findings and recommendations of the Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety and Dame Judith Hackitt’s interim report, ‘Building a Safer Future’.

The review was set up after the Grenfell Tower fire of June 2017, and has focused primarily on improving fire safety in high-rise residential blocks and other complex buildings. The report also looks at what can be done more broadly to address perceived system failings in the building regulatory system and deeper cultural problems in the construction industry around regulatory compliance and responsibility. To sum up, the report said that the ‘current regulatory system for ensuring fire safety in high-rise and complex buildings is not fit for purpose. This applies throughout the life cycle of a building, both during construction and occupation, and is a problem connected both to the culture of the construction industry and the effectiveness of the regulators’. The interim report comes ahead of a final report due in spring 2018. Among the views put forward by the GAI last year was the potential reintroduction of the Clerk of Works role.

Douglas Masterson, GAI technical manager, says: “This was one of the GAI’s key recommendations, as a better regime of inspecting the installation of fire doors and ironmongery on site by a trained professional who is aware of many of the regulations and standards as well as their application would eliminate many of the current gaps in fire safety.”

In the stakeholder evidence section of the interim report, Hackitt specifically discusses ironmongery and repeats the view that “many products are tested totally in isolation and do not account for the interaction with other elements. For a fire door to function, all of the components (seals, glazing, ironmongery) must be compatible. Many lack a formal process to check that products are as originally specified, or even whether the products that are delivered to site are as specification.”

In the GAI’s submission, it called for fire door inspections and third-party certification of fire safety products to be mandatory and for fire services to be more involved in the sign-off of buildings.

The report also addresses the industry-wide issue of ‘value engineering’ which, it says, was almost always about cutting cost out of a project.

Douglas Masterson says: “The GAI and its members would welcome any change to existing value engineering practice. There need to be more controls placed on the substitution of specified materials. Ironmongery, which is one of the last elements fitted to a building, is often at risk of being substituted and not always to an equivalent standard. This creates potentially fatal fire safety issues. We’re glad that this issue is finally being recognised and look forward to seeing how the final review will improve the specification process.”

A better qualified supply chain was also raised in the report, with a recommendation by Hackitt that those working on the design, construction, inspection and maintenance of complex and high-risk buildings are suitably qualified. Masterson says: “We totally support the development of a more joined-up system covering all levels of qualification in relevant disciplines. The GAI’s diploma and CPD programme provides a professional and up-to-date qualification which demonstrates an individual’s ability to specify architectural ironmongery – a critical life safety element of any building – to a high level. We believe the GAI can play an active role in supporting this aspect of the Hackitt review.”

The Independent Review has also said that during its next phase of work it will conduct further research into the potential for Building Information Modelling (BIM) to improve the documentation and handover of essential fire safety information.

The Guild has just released 35 BIM product data templates to its members so they can provide Product Data Sheets to deliver their product information in a structured manner to architects and contractors.

And at the Association of British Insurers, Mark Shepherd, Head of Property at the ABI, said: “A thorough review of building regulations was long overdue and it’s a tragedy that it took the devastating Grenfell Tower fire to focus attention on this issue.”

For the report, visit https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/668831/Independent_Review_of_Building_Regulations_and_Fire_Safety_web_accessible.pdf.

Related News

  • Interviews

    Troy Hewitt Q&A

    by Mark Rowe

    While an international guarding company, Allied Universal with offices in London is a UK security company with CSAS (community safety accreditation scheme).…

  • Interviews

    ASIS autumn meet

    by Mark Rowe

    Hostage negotiation is among the speaker topics for the autumn 2014 quarterly meeting of the UK chapter of the international security association…

  • Interviews

    Security meet

    by Mark Rowe

    Representatives from UK private security companies operating abroad and Government officials gathered in central London to discuss progress and opportunities. In a…

Newsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter to stay on top of security news and events.

© 2024 Professional Security Magazine. All rights reserved.

Website by MSEC Marketing