Board members are more confident than management about their organisation’s ability to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), in time for the May 25 deadline, according to a survey by a data security company.
The research by Clearswift, which surveyed 600 business decision makers and 1,200 employees across the UK, US, Germany and Australia, found that 41pc of board level respondents think they have all of the necessary processes in place to be GDPR compliant, yet, only a quarter of senior management and even fewer middle management respondents (21pc) thought the same. As for the right to be forgotten (RTBF), which entitles EU citizens to request that an organisation deletes all references to them that it holds, over half (56%) of board level respondents think that their organisation could handle hundreds of requests at once. Yet, only a third (36pc) of middle management agree.
Not only did the research show a differing opinion between the board and management level respondents, but it also offered insights into the extent of data duplication that exists within organisations. For example, near half 49pc of board level respondents, and 31pc of middle management, thought their organisation definitely duplicated customer data.
Two thirds (66pc) of board level respondents and 70pc of senior management thought employees in their organisation have downloaded work documents to their personal devices (such as a laptop, smartphone or tablet) that they have not later deleted (unintentionally or otherwise).
Dr Guy Bunker, SVP Products at Clearswift, said: “Board level respondents may have a misplaced confidence when it comes to their organisation’s level of GDPR compliance. However, once a board becomes aware that its confidence may be misplaced, then it is immediately one-step closer to compliance. By engaging closely with management, the board will have a much clearer and more accurate view of the state of compliance, and will be able to put measures in place to address any issues.”
“Middle management is more likely to have a better view of the data that their organisation holds – where it is saved and how it is being used – because they are more familiar with the day-to-day operations and challenges that staff may encounter. For example, if a company doesn’t have its own private file sharing service, then this may drive employees to use third party sites or download data onto a USB. Management should be encouraged by the board not to filter out ‘bad’ information. For example, if data duplication is rife then the board needs to know so it can address the issue in time for the GDPR deadline.
“GDPR can be the first step towards better information governance: GDPR compliance is about being able to recognise a particular data set and protect it accordingly. The same processes and technology can be used to protect other types of information that are valuable to your organisation. For example, product design documents, price lists, patent applications and even information around service pricing and contract bids.”
Clearswift has published a whitepaper, The GDPR Divide: Board Views vs Middle-Management, available for download: http://pages.clearswift.com/GDPR-divide-guide-2018.html.
