- Security TWENTY
- Women in Security
The Coalition Government has published the controversial Communications Data Bill. Communications data is information generated about a communication. It includes the time and duration of a communication, the number or email address of the originator and recipient and sometimes the location of the device from which the communication was made. Communications data is distinct from communications content, the Home Office has stressed.
The legislation will require Communications Service Providers, when requested to do so, to retain and store communications records which they may not retain at present for their own business reasons. According to the Government, communications data is already used by the police and is vital for day-to-day police work and in particular the investigation of all forms of serious crime, including terrorism and child abuse. This legislation will ensure that, as communications technology changes, the police will maintain access to this data in future. But access to data will continue to be permitted only in the context of a specific investigation of operation.
However the civil liberties body Liberty said that it was dismayed by what it called a ‘snoopers’ charter’. According to Liberty, the Government claims the Draft Communications Data Bill will “maintain” the ability of law enforcement to access communications data. In fact Liberty went on the proposals will dramatically increase the amount of information retained on the phone calls, emails, texts and web habits of the entire population. Access to this information is not limited to law enforcement but is instead granted to all local authorities and hundreds of other public bodies for a range of purposes that have nothing to do with crime fighting, Liberty said. The vasdata collection will turn a nation of citizens into a nation of suspects and allow the authorities to build a very intimate picture of someone’s personal life and such blanket surveillance will inevitably lead to discrimination.Shami Chakrabarti, Director of Liberty, said: “Two years ago, the Coalition bound itself together with promises and action to protect our rights and freedoms. As the strains of governing in a recession begin to show, politicians of all parties should remember the values that we are all supposed to share. Whilst action on free speech is extremely welcome, proposals for secret courts and a snoopers’ charter risk allowing no scrutiny for them and no privacy for us.”
The Home Office said that four key bodies will be allowed to apply for access to data under new rules in the Bill – the police, the Serious Organised Crime Agency(SOCA)/National Crime Agency (NCA), the intelligence agencies and Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. Hundreds of public bodies – including local authorities – have access to communications data, but will not be covered by the new laws unless Parliament agrees their use is vital to tackling crime and protecting the public. Accoding to the Home Office, the Bill will ensure law enforcement agencies maintain the ability to tackle crime and terrorism as criminals use modern technology and new ways of communicating to plan and commit crime. Without action by government crimes enabled by email and the internet will increasingly go undetected and unpunished.
The Coalition pointed to the increase in the use of new technology and the volume of data on UK networks in recent years. There are now more than 80 million mobile phone subscriptions in the UK. Over a quarter of UK adults are smart-phone users, with 60 per cent buying their phone in the last year. Data volumes transferred over mobile networks increased by 67 per cent in 2010.
Publishing the Bill, Home Secretary Theresa May, pictured, said: ‘Communications data saves lives. It is a vital tool for the police to catch criminals and to protect children.If we stand by as technology changes we will leave police officers fighting crime with one hand tied behind their backs. Checking communication records, not content, is a crucial part of day-to-day policing and the fingerprinting of the modern age – we are determined to ensure its continued availability in cracking down on crime.’
The new proposals will see communications data taken out of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) and the creation of a new regulatory framework. According to the Government, aess to the vast majority of communications data is currently conducted through RIPA, but there are a multitude of other powers public bodies can use – including Acts governing environmental protection, pensions and financial services. The new Bill will replace the dozens of available powers with a single piece of legislation, all under the auspices of the Interception of Communications Commissioner.
The legislation will also ensure according to the Home Office that there is a level playing field for communication service providers (CSPs). They will be reimbursed for any costs of complying with legislation. Obligations will not be placed on every CSP and will only be imposed after detailed discussion and ministerial sign-off. CSPs will be able to appeal to a technical advisory board under dispute procedures if they feel requests made of them are unnecessarily onerous.
Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) crime head Jon Murphy chief constable of Merseyside Police said: ‘Communications data is vital to law enforcement. It is an essential and irreplaceable tool for protecting the public, keeping people safe from harm and, ultimately, saving lives. It provides investigative breakthroughs to the most serious of crimes, including child abuse, murder, rape, kidnapping, cyber crime and terrorism offences.’
CEOP Chief Executive Peter Davies said: ‘We protect and safeguard children and pursue offenders who cause such serious harm. Without communications data and intelligence, we would not be able to act as fast as we need to and, in many instances, we would not be in a position to act at all.’
SOCA Director General Trevor Pearce said: ‘Any significant reduction in the capability of law enforcement agencies to acquire and exploit intercept intelligence and evidential communications data would lead to more unsolved murders, more firearms on our streets, more successful robberies, more unresolved kidnaps, more harm from the use of class A drugs, more illegal immigration and more unsolved serious crime overall. This would mean SOCA, the Metropolitan Police and other agencies relying more heavily on more expensive, more risky and potentially more intrusive techniques to locate and apprehend offenders.’