Case Studies

Private military security paper

by Mark Rowe

The true cost of war is being masked by the secretive and largely unaccountable activities of a private security industry, according to a new study by a UK university.

These invisible costs of war – in terms of casualties and financial resources – are not reported and are hard to find because contractors are not subject to the same reporting structures and laws as the regular military, and many of their activities are protected from Freedom of Information requests.

Private security firms – usually run by former senior figures in the military, civil service or politics – are increasingly taking on the role of the military services, but are not subject to the same scrutiny, says a recent paper published in the journal Organization.

Private contractors are widely used by Britain and the United States. In conflict zones such as Iraq and Afghanistan, contractors guard bases, commercial enterprises and government installations; provide escort services for convoys; or guard individuals, according to the study. This creates opportunities for private security, at the same time as reducing the financial burdens that military interventions traditionally bring to the occupying state.

The paper from Richard Godfrey, Jo Brewis, Jo Grady and Chris Grocott, all academics at the University of Leicester School of Management, argues that the failure to establish appropriate regulation has resulted in a lack of transparency and accountability. It also argues that the private security firms and governments that employ them should be more open about the way the industry is organised and managed.

Secrecy over the employment of civilians for roles previously undertaken by the military hampers any real attempt at greater public and political debate, say the authors

“These are commercial organisations that form a global industry worth billions of pounds and which impacts on thousands of lives – civilian and military,” says the paper, The Private Security Industry and Neoliberal Imperialism – Mapping the Terrain.

“The lack of oversight and reporting hides the true costs of current military activity. The death and injury count for private contractors is not recorded and there is even less data on the deaths and injuries they cause in any theatre of operations.”

As state powers are delegated to the private sector, the study identifies what the academics term ‘a new security-industrial complex’ being run largely by social elites made up of former senior military, public officials and government ministers.

Related News

  • Case Studies

    UK site contracts

    by Mark Rowe

    The Bromsgrove-based contractor GMS Security Services Ltd reports a stream of security contracts with the building materials supplier CEMEX. GMS initially won…

  • Case Studies

    Cyber hoarder study

    by Mark Rowe

    While we are familiar with physical hoarding, little has been done into the digital equivalent; which can cost businesses money and be…

Newsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter to stay on top of security news and events.

© 2024 Professional Security Magazine. All rights reserved.

Website by MSEC Marketing