Case Studies

Heritage free guide

by Mark Rowe

Heritage sites bring potential security risks. Hence the British Security Industry Association (BSIA) has published a free Guide to Security of Heritage Properties. Pictured: St Mawes Castle, Cornwall, an English Heritage property.

The 68-page document sets out the varied risks – from metal theft from roofs to outright theft for their metal value of war memorials; to arson and graffiti against buildings, and theft of objects of value inside stately homes open to the public or not, such as works of art.

Form 188 is designed to provide owners, managers and guardians of all kinds of heritage and property with an overview of the common considerations of risk assessments and security measures – from forensic marking of property to electronic security and lone worker safety products – be taken into account for heritage sites.

What is the aim?

The guide aims to describe the security threats faced by historic properties (as well as those with a shared community value) and explain the techniques, products and services available to protect them.

Paul Phillips, Technical Officer at the BSIA and author of the guide says: “Caring for a heritage property is by no means a cheap exercise and putting right damage after a crime could cripple owners financially so providing good security is essential. Protecting unique properties often means using unique and costly solutions but with the help of this guide owners should be able to make the most of limited resources and help save our history and culture for the future.”

The guide is primarily intended for owners of private houses, smaller businesses in listed properties, custodians of individual properties open to the public and groups of volunteers caring for heritage in their community.

What’s unique about heritage?

Heritage security is unique, the guide suggests, in that alterations (such as adding electronic security systems) can devalue sites. Often the listed nature of heritage properties means that modern security measures, commonplace elsewhere, are not permitted. Even where security measures are permitted, they often prove more costly for listed buildings. Yet the guide points out that heritage security is an important aspect of heritage property maintenance. For example, it is often the case that heritage properties have been built without consideration for modern criminal behaviour. Any modernising security measures must therefore be weighed carefully against the ‘devaluing effect’ that alterations can incur. That is, security measures need to be as unobtrusive as possible – a Georgian shop front with external roller shutters becomes a bland modern building. Similarly, fitting CCTV cameras to the front of a historic house can be unappealing and – in some instances – may breach regulations.

Heritage properties are often in open areas, remote from neighbours. Isolation makes them more difficult to protect. Similarly, (as is often the case) the need to allow authorised public access can inadvertently facilitate criminal access.

Simon Alderson, Development Director of BSIA member company Vacant Property Specialists (VPS) and Chairman of the BSIA’s Vacant Property Protection group, adds: “Heritage sites are often remote and packed with materials that can attract crime – lead roofs, copper piping, old libraries. It sounds like something from a Cluedo set, but for the few pounds thieves may obtain from selling stolen metals, they can cause tens of thousands of pounds of damage. Plus vacant sites are also targets for illegal raves and squats.”

The guide covers ways in which security measures can be employed and installed in what can appear to be complicated circumstances. It also details ways to achieve effective security within the boundaries of available resources. Alongside informed suggestions, the guide contains case-studies detailing how BSIA member companies have provided security and protection for heritage properties. It also describes a way of approaching security that should help end-users facing difficult decisions relating to the allocation of resources.

The BSIA adds that given the often unique nature of heritage sites and the security issues surrounding them, it is especially important to draw on the expertise of those with experience in this particular field. For larger or more complex problems the employment of a security consultant can often provide cost-effective advice for a combination of practices and equipment.

It is always advisable to talk to your insurers as insurance companies can provide valuable advice. Further, if you fail to follow their recommendations this could be a problem in the event of a claim. To download the BSIA’s Heritage Guide, (Form 188) free visit the BSIA website.

Related News

  • Case Studies

    Clapham contract

    by Mark Rowe

    A facilities management (FM) contractor has won a facilities contract with Clapham One, the landmark new-build on Clapham High Street in south…

  • Case Studies

    ASB pilot

    by Mark Rowe

    Gloucestershire Police and Restorative Gloucestershire with Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Borough Councils have launched a new review process for incidents of anti-social behaviour…

Newsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter to stay on top of security news and events.

© 2024 Professional Security Magazine. All rights reserved.

Website by MSEC Marketing